
|
L I t T e R |

|
C.J. Allen |

|
the spectacular detailing & pin-sharp observation. She once said that writing poetry ‘is a way of life, not a matter of testifying but experiencing. It is not the way in which one goes about interpreting the world, but the very process of sensing it.’ And among the many qualities that contribute to her stature as a writer is her peculiarly sensual descriptive precision – which is remarkable enough in itself, but in Elizabeth Bishop’s poetry this is yoked to a profound musical sensibility. The combination is … well, judge for yourself: |
|
The five fish houses have steeply peaked roofs |
|
And narrow, cleated gangplanks slant up |
|
To store rooms in the gables |
|
For the wheelbarrows to be pushed up and down on. |
|
All is silver: the heavy surface of the sea, |
|
Swelling slowly as if considering spilling over, |
|
Is opaque, but the silver of the benches, |
|
The lobster pots, and masts, scattered |
|
Among the wild jagged rocks, |
|
Is of an apparent translucence |
|
Like the small old buildings with an emerald moss |
|
Growing on their shoreward walls. |
|
|
|
‘From At the Fishhouses’ |
|
|
|
Notice how the vowel sounds of ‘steeply peaked’ are picked up in ‘cleated’ in the next line, tucked away between those piping short ‘a’s of narrow, gangplanks and slant. If you take a moment to read these lines aloud you’ll quickly begin to get a sense of the exquisite technical achievement. You’ll hear the swishing & sibilant sea-ness of ‘All is silver: the heavy surface of the sea, / Swelling slowly as if considering spilling …’ And yet the whole thing comes off as such a modest, unshowy, monologue. |
|
The tumult in the heart |
|
keeps asking questions. |
|
And then it stops and undertakes to answer |
|
in the same tone of voice. |
|
No-one could tell the difference. |
|
|
|
Her writing is remarkably specific, filled with exact & exacting detail. Yet when we read the poems carefully & repeatedly, a sort of luminous mystery begins to seep through. It’s precisely this quality of strangeness, of otherworldliness that keeps us returning to her work, & keeps the poetry perennially fresh & compelling. |


|
Despite what the poet James Merrill has described as her ‘instinctive, modest, life-long impersonation of an ordinary woman’, Elizabeth Bishop’s life, seamed as it was with significant episodes of personal tragedy, isolation & rootlessness, tells a somewhat different story. She was born in 1911, in Worcester, Massachusetts. Her father died when she was an infant & her mother was committed to an asylum when Elizabeth was only four years old. As a young child she lived with her maternal grandparents in Nova Scotia before returning to live in Worcester with her late father’s family. After studying at Vassar College (where she was introduced to her lifelong friend & poetic mentor, Marianne Moore), she moved first to New York & then to Key West in Florida, publishing her first volume of poems, ‘North & South’, in 1946. Whilst on a trip to South America, she was suddenly taken ill & when the freighter on which she’d been travelling left her behind, she found herself temporarily stranded in Brazil. As it happens, this unexpected biographical twist turned out rather well for her, and she ended up staying there for the next eighteen years, largely due to the fact that it was in Brazil that she met Lota de Macedo Soares, the woman with |


|
whom by her own accounts, she enjoyed a long & happy relationship. Much is often made of Elizabeth Bishop’s sexuality; none of it, it should be pointed out, by Elizabeth Bishop. She consistently maintained that it had no bearing at all on her work as a writer. She would, for example, refuse permission to have her work featured in anthologies of women poets. For her there was no merit in being judged apart; ‘art is art,’ she wrote in 1977, ‘and to separate writings, paintings, musical compositions, etc., into two sexes is to emphasize values in them that are not art.’ While she may well remain the poet’s poet, she was clearly never the lesbian’s lesbian. After Lota’s suicide in 1967 Elizabeth Bishop returned to live and work in America, teaching at Washington & Harvard. However, her health steadily declined as her periodic bouts of alcoholism began to take their toll. She died in 1979. |
|
About the size of an old-style dollar bill, |
|
American or Canadian, |
|
mostly the same whites, gray-greens and steel grays |
|
- this little painting (a sketch for a larger one?) |
|
has never earned any money in its life. |
|
Useless and free it has spent seventy years |
|
as a minor family relic. |
|
|
|
Is she writing about a painting? Or her poetry? Or herself? The answer is, of course, that she is writing about all three. But it’s about something else as well. It’s about a sort of patient & careful attention that has much to do with human love. ‘Poem’ concludes: |
|
|
|
Life and the memory of it cramped, |
|
dim, on a piece of Bristol board, |
|
dim, but how we live, how touching in detail |
|
- the little that we get for free, |
|
the little of our earthly trust. Not much. |
|
About the size of our abidance |
|
along with theirs: the munching cows, |
|
the iris crisp and shivering, the water |
|
still standing from the spring freshets, |
|
the yet-to-be-dismantled elms, the geese. |
|
|
|
Through its exceptional craft, Elizabeth Bishop’s poetry fuses the mundane with the elevated and jaw-droppingly brilliant descriptive passages with a kind of transcendental philosophy. If that makes it sound rather worthy & serious, believe me – it isn’t. It is intelligent, touching, charming, & intensely human, & it never flinches from looking squarely & unsentimentally at life. |
|
If you tasted it, it would first taste bitter, |
|
then briny, then surely burn your tongue. |
|
It is like what we imagine knowledge to be: |
|
dark, salt, clear, moving, utterly free, |
|
drawn from the cold hard mouth |
|
of the world, derived from the rocky breasts |
|
forever, flowing and drawn, and since |
|
our knowledge is historical, flowing and flown. |
|
|
|
The ocean is the ocean & the wonder & ungraspable-ness of the world. Knowledge of the world is bitter & dangerous but also ‘clear, moving, utterly free’. Somehow ‘flowing’ & ‘flown’ call down their unspoken rhymes knowing & known. |