'Lever Arch' by Mark Burnhope (Knives, Forks and Spoons Press)
There is a type of poem that allows the reader, after a certain number of readings, to completely grasp the meaning of the poem, and such poems often have an authorial voice that guides the reader and prompts them to a certain response. The poems in "Lever Arch" are not of this type; they are 'open form' poems which are different on each reading and full of possibilities.
In an epigraph to the first section, 'lever' Burnhope quotes Larry Eigner:
"I thought myself that immediacy and force have to take precedence over clarity in a poem... so the poem does become a thought process or arc or course of thought or trace or artifact of the same, maybe more than a machine made of words."
Eigner's poetry appears to focus on physical objects, but isolates them as disconnected nouns, in a way that brings the focus onto the words themselves as text, as sound and as visual elements on the page; he was therefore a significant influence on poets like Ron Silliman who worked on the assumption that language is a self-referential, closed system. Burnhope sets himself a challenge by quoting a master like Eigner, but in some poems at least rises to it successfully. As an example, the poem 'air show', looks up to a Red Arrow flying display, then brings the reader down to the speaker's immediate thoughts, on to (possibly) noise from the street, then through more internal dialogue, to this:
fly on
white wallpaper
couldn't have covered m
ore faster
if it tried
here: the gruff throat
When I read this I found myself going back and forth (or left and right) between the words, making different combinations; as a reader I was left at the textual surface, treating each word as a visual and aural component. The next lines continue with the flow of thought and perception, and throughout the poem the movement is swift and skilfully handled, as it takes the reader with it on its journey through the speaker's mind. The distressed typewriter-style font gives a sense of urgency, as well as a feeling that labour was required to produce the poems, that they are artefacts.
Unusually for contemporary 'innovative' poetry, these poems engage with religion, specifically, Christianity, and include words and phrases associated with the Bible and Christian rituals. Sometimes, this is explicit, as in the poem 'the sprung purchased' in which the poem, beginning 'we will be / born as lambs' has woven into it the words 'kyrie' and 'eleison' - the Greek words for 'lord' and 'forgiveness' commonly used in Christian rituals. More often in these poems, words with religious associations are used in a post-modern mix with contemporary idiom:
a trinity of women
when she lowers the lever
to draw water my daughter
whom the messiah thirsty approaches
(from 'who she is')
because Bethlehem vanished in a blizzard
off correction fluid and shoots grown on
from p
alms crossed with shekels flowered
(from 'seasoned reasons')
The religious element of these poems works, because it doesn't sermonize; it just drops these phrases into the linguistic mix and lets the reader make of it what they may. This is the most obvious contrast with Eigner; the allusive mode: the references to Blake and Matthew Arnold, and, as mentioned, the use of Christian terminology. And yet, one might say despite this, the poetry conveys a sense of immediacy. Even a poem like 'the way of', about the burial and resurrection of Christ ('heave // ho the boulder/ after three days un / cove / r') manages to seem a record of direct perception, as it brings the scene back to everyday experience ('daffodils golding the grave' and 'nuthatch song the nail / squeaking') rather in the manner that renaissance painters placed biblical scenes in the northern European landscapes they knew. As a result of this, these poems give a sense, not of any dogmatic religious belief, but, as the poem 'was the word' puts it:
no conclusions faith is nearer
now to agnosticism
The sections of the book are named 'lever', 'ache', 'lover', 'arch' and 'leaver', and the obvious correspondences (lever/leaver/lover etc.) display an awareness on the part of the writer that the life described is wrapped up in text; that the poems are textual objects. The writerley self-consciousness found throughout the book makes the emotional force of the poems all the more powerful, as in the love-poem 'dedication', which begins:
cause there is
even a decade late
r no text apt
or plush en
ough to
wrap you in
the line-endings in the middle of phrases, sometimes of words, as above, embody a nervousness and tenderness which frees the poem from sentimentality and allows the end of the poem to work as a simple expression of affection:
you ask what
I have writ
en and can
you read it
first be
fore
any
one else
this
this
this
and yes
you can
The last poem of the book, 'Bournemouth Beach', a revisioning of Arnold's 'Dover Beach', adopts the tone of prayer, asking that we be 'for one another/all the poet wished we would for joy for love/for light'. Like other work in this collection, the poem undercuts the note of piety with broken phrases and switches of tone, to end on some beautiful lines:
listen again faith's sea is at her full
(all of this brindle synthesis
animal human st
one st
illness)
she flings her bright girdle and reclines
The poems in this book are remarkable in the way that they synthesise immediacy of perception with allusive and resonant language; a synthesis which allows them to effectively engage with past poetries and with spirituality, as well as with quotidien reality.
Copyright © 2013 Alan Baker
|