Litter Home Page

 Header image

Steven Waling


"In Defense of Nothing: Selected Poems 1987-2011, Peter Gizzi (Wesleyan)

Reading these poems, time after time I’m struck by how lithely and beautifully they move from line to line; there’s a surface ease to these poems that belies their deep investigation of self and identity in the world of things and relationships. In fact, his poems can be described as ‘a picture / inside a question inside / the coming night’.

He is – like so many late-modernist poets – a lyric poet who constantly questions the lyrical. It seems the shadow of Adorno spreads over modern poetry like a shroud: how do you write beautifully in a world that isn’t beautiful? These poems are not directly political; they’re not protest poems about the latest political atrocity. The poems in the last collection here, haunted by the deaths of family and friends, are not strictly elegies; but the ghosts are there all the time, asking questions, looking out from between the lines.

Although this is a poetry concerned with living in the present, images from childhood drift in and out like ghosts, sometimes commented on sometimes left to hang in the background like mobiles: as he says in Pierced:

          The heart of poetry is an angry child
          a decaying spider in a chain link fence
          a rotten cushion at the bottom of a stream
          springs busted out, fabric torn
          a shooting gallery in the basement
          the heart of poetry is a ripped sock
          covering the wound, fresh with it

It’s as if the poet is an idealistic child himself, constantly disappointed by the world as it is, with its wars and its vicious politics, its media ‘spitting electro-/magnetic lies into the room.’

One can discern some of the influences behind this poetry: Ashbery for instance, in the use of seeming non-sequiters, James Schuyler and a kind of generalised New York School influence that includes Berrigan and others. There is a curiously pastoral nature to some of the poetry, though it’s often a dirty one, full of human detritus and questioning. Language poetry is also an influence, but this is nowhere near as forbidding as some of that school. He is constantly questioning language and its limitations, poking at the edge of lyricism; but it’s less combative.

The poems often feel like meditations at night, even if they’re set in daylight and the anger is quiet, almost resigned, as in the opening of A Panic That Can Still Come Upon Me, where he is obviously watching the evening news:

          If our loves are anointed with missiles
          Apache fire, Tomahawks
          did we follow the tablets the pilgrims suggested

The wars are going on elsewhere, but the poet is still involved, at a distance. That poem goes on to question the pronouns: who is the I, they, you (plural or singular?) but the real world is never too far away (‘when I am a tiger in the DMZ’).

These are poems to meditate on and think about. Philosophical and at once quiet, they constantly disturb their own beauty by making you return constantly to the question of how to live in this wonder-full but violent world.





Copyright © Steven Waling, 2015